Memo from Joseph Pilling to Quentin Thomas Regarding the Note on Amnesty Processes by E C Hallett | Quill

Icon Legend

Toggle All CLOSE

Do you want to go straight to a particular resource? Use the Jump Tool and follow 2 steps:

Look for the pages that have the shortcut code symbol Quill - Jump To Icon (e4242)

Jump To

e4242
You can click this icon to copy the jump to url to that page to your clipboard, ready to paste into emails, notes, documents or research papers as needed.

This can usually be found in the top hero section of overview, delegations visualize, session visualize, event visualize, commentary collection, commentary item, resource collection, and resource item pages.

Enter the shortcut code for the page that you wish to search for.

Retrieving full text, please wait

These documents were scanned, collated and catalogued by Ruth Murray, Annabel Harris, Isha Pareek, Eleanor Williams, Antoine Yenk, Harriet Carter, Oliver Nicholls, Kieran Wetherwick, and Cerys Griffiths.

Collection associations (0)

None

1990-12-13

This memo replies to the note drafted by E C Hallett on the amnesties granted by the British Government in the context of negotiations for independence in Cyprus, Kenya, India, Ghana and Ireland, 1916-1921. Joseph Pilling questions the relevance of the first four case studies and places emphasis on the case of Ireland 1916-1917 as the most relevant for providing a precedent. He requests further information about the release of prisoners in Ireland in 1917.

CJ 4/9296 1990

consent principle downing street declaration ground rules and procedural challenges in talks identity paramilitary activity (republican) self-determination uk legislation policing and justice victims

Jump To

i22807

CJ 4/9296

55 1990 - 1991

Search items