Throughout the platform, pink, round icons are events relating to individuals:
Person joining a committee
Person leaving a committee
Person elected to a position
Parchment-coloured, square icons relate to the creation and amending of documents:
Create a new proposal
Proposal to be voted
Copy a proposal
Import a proposal
Debate a proposal
Diamond-shaped, purple icons relate to decisions taken:
Drop a proposal
Refer a proposal
Adopt a proposal
Reject a proposal
Postpone a debate
Blue, hexagon-shaped icons relate to 'procedural' proposals that do not directly alter text but affect
how a committee does its work:
Procedural motion with sub-decisions
Debate a motion
The Convention debates whether officials should be removable by impeachment, and if so how.
Cite as: Kat Howarth, Impeachment and the Convention, Quill Project at Pembroke College (Oxford, accessed 2018)
List of conventions with comments
To see where the comments are in the convention, click on the corresponding convention below.
Locations of comments in the convention
To see highlight the related comments to the session in the convention, click on the corresponding coloured circle below.
Download Jump To Label (click on the image to download)
Or Embed Jump To Inside Your Webpage
<img src="https://www.quillproject.net/getJumpToImage/c10" alt="Quill - Jump To Icon (c10)" style="width: 110px; height: 59px;">
The Impeachment Clause (Article II, §4 of the US Constitution) provides that ‘The President, Vice President and all Civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.’ However, it did not start life in that form in the Constitutional Convention of 1787, and had some had their way wouldn’t have ended up in the Constitution at all.
The main questions that the Framers tackled in relation to impeachment were which offences would result in impeachment, who could impeach the executive and who would try the impeachment, and (a point of debate that may be surprising to some) whether impeachment of the executive was appropriate at all. Although some may consider it obvious now that there should be some mechanism to ensure the removal of those in high office if they committed certain offences, during the 1787 Convention the topic was nowhere near as cut and dry as that, and lengthy debate took place not only to decide who could try impeachments but whether or not they should happen at all for the executive.
This Commentary Collection is designed to plot the notable propositions and debates centred on impeachment, including an initial suggestion of ‘removal’ and late stage back and forth over who should be responsible for trying an impeachment. The legal and political background to the clause has also been explored in the context of the Framers resources and possible inspirations at the time.
Virginia Plan [Resolutions] - Seventh Resolution (Executive Branch): Dickinson/Bedford on Removal was debated
on 02 June 1787
The Virginia Plan as amended in Committee [Resolutions] - Ninth Resolution (Working Version): Length of Term - McClurg/Morris for Good Behaviour was debated
on 17 July 1787
The Virginia Plan as amended in Committee [Resolutions] - Eleventh Resolution (Working Version): Third Clause - Wilson/Morris for Appointment by Executive was debated
on 18 July 1787
The Virginia Plan as amended in Committee [Resolutions] - Ninth Resolution (Working Version) was debated
on 19 July 1787
The Virginia Plan as amended in Committee [Resolutions] - Ninth Resolution (Working Version): Length of Term was debated
on 19 July 1787
The Virginia Plan as amended in Committee [Resolutions] - Ninth Resolution (Working Version): Impeachment Clause was debated
on 20 July 1787
Second Report of the Grand Committee on Postponed Questions: Article X - Second Amendment to Section 2: Mason Amends His Proposal was proposed
on 08 September 1787
Second Report of the Grand Committee on Postponed Questions: Article X - Second Amendment to Section 2 was debated
on 08 September 1787